Epstein Barr Virus & Molecular Mimicry in Multiple Sclerosis (MS): B-Cell Auto-Reactivity
Anne-Marie Datcu
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune condition that affects the nervous system resulting in central nervous system (CNS) demyelination. 1-4 MS is most common among females and typically affects adults aged 20 – 30 years old.1-3,5 In recent epidemiologic studies, it has been shown there is a higher incidence of MS in the United States Black population, with a higher risk in black women. 3 Low vitamin D, childhood obesity, smoking and microbiome composition haven been shown to impact the risk of MS.3 HLA-DBR1*15:01 has been associated with risk of MS. 3,6 It has been shown that Epstein Barr virus (EBV) infection is associated with the development of MS. 5 MS presents due to the initial inflammation of the CNS. Patients will often present with varying neurologic symptoms.1,2,7 Differential diagnoses need to be considered since there are other disorders that mimic MS.2 There is no cure for MS; current treatment predominantly includes FDA approved disease modification therapies to delay disease progression.1,2 Despite identifying that EBV is critical in the development of MS, further research is being done to establish mechanisms of how EBV causes MS to identify revolutionary therapeutic approaches.
Objectives: The purpose of this review is to analyze research regarding proposed molecular mimicry mechanism occurring in MS patients after infection from EBV.
Methods: An online literature search in the PubMed Database was conducted using the following MESH Terms: Multiple Sclerosis/ Immunology. Results were restricted to reviews, clinical studies, and abstracts published from 2018 – 2024. Articles were screened for relevance to molecular mimicry pathophysiology.
Results: One study examined the composition of B-cells in the CSF of MS patients in response to EBV and Epstein-Barr Nuclear Antigen 1 (EBNA).8 Authors observed B-cells encountered antigen and had undergone somatic hypermutation.8 IgM and IgG were associated with breakdown of the blood brain barrier. 8 CSF B-cells and plasma cells that have encountered antigen were also more likely to be of an inflammatory phenotype compared to peripheral counterparts, like TBX21, UBA7, and SDC1.9 EBNA1 on EBV is similar to GlialCAM so it also attacks the healthy GlialCAM in the immune response.8 Plasma of MS patients and healthy controls was analyzed for cross-reactivity with EBNA1 and GlialCAM.8 In the plasma cells of MS patients compared to healthy controls, reactivity to EBNA1 and to GlialCAM was increased.8 The presence of ANO2 antibodies in MS and is speculated to trigger a cytotoxic T-cell response.10 One study measured IgG antibody reactivity toward ANO2 and EBNA1.10 Anti-ANO2 antibodies were elevated in MS in comparison with controls.10 The mechanisms of how autoimmune response against ANO2 might act in MS is unclear, but it is hypothesized to be occurring through a similar molecular mimicry model. 10 One study found that T-cells were activated by EBNA 1 due to their sequence-relationship and may not be activated by B-Cells alone.8 T-cell that recognized GlialCAM and EBNA-1 produced granzyme & IFN- 8
Conclusion: Clarifying the molecular mechanisms that are involved in the interaction of MS and EBV can be utilized for future therapeutic developments.
Works Cited:
- McGinley MP, Goldschmidt CH, Rae-Grant AD. Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review. Jama. Feb 23 2021;325(8):765-779. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.26858
- Olek MJ. Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Intern Med. Jun 2021;174(6):Itc81-itc96. doi:10.7326/aitc202106150
- 3.Ward M, Goldman MD. Epidemiology and Pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis. Continuum (Minneap Minn). Aug 1 2022;28(4):988-1005. doi:10.1212/con.0000000000001136
- Hauser SL, Cree BAC. Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review. Am J Med. Dec 2020;133(12):1380-1390.e2. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.049
- 5.Thomas OG, Olsson T. Mimicking the brain: Epstein-Barr virus and foreign agents as drivers of neuroimmune attack in multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1304281. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1304281
- Aloisi F, Giovannoni G, Salvetti M. Epstein-Barr virus as a cause of multiple sclerosis: opportunities for prevention and therapy. Lancet Neurol. Apr 2023;22(4):338-349. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00471-9
- Chertcoff A, Schneider R, Azevedo CJ, Sicotte N, Oh J. Recent Advances in Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Disease-Monitoring Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurol Clin. Feb 2024;42(1):15-38. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2023.06.008
- 8.Lanz TV, Brewer RC, Ho PP, et al. Clonally expanded B cells in multiple sclerosis bind EBV EBNA1 and GlialCAM. Nature. Mar 2022;603(7900):321-327. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04432-7
- Ramesh A, Schubert RD, Greenfield AL, et al. A pathogenic and clonally expanded B cell transcriptome in active multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep 15 2020;117(37):22932-22943. doi:10.1073/pnas.2008523117
- 10.Tengvall K, Huang J, Hellström C, et al. Molecular mimicry between Anoctamin 2 and Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 associates with multiple sclerosis risk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug 20 2019;116(34):16955-16960. doi:10.1073/pnas.1902623116