HPV Infection Induces Secondary Mutations Resulting in Host Immune Defense Evasion and Oropharyngeal Cancer Abstract
Masen Ragsdale
Introduction. In recent years, there has been a rise in the incidences of human papilloma virus-positive oropharyngeal cancer, especially in men.1,2 A persistent HPV 16 infection is responsible for 70% or more of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC).1,2 Risk factors for developing this type of cancer include risky sexual behavior and engaging in oral sex with multiple partners.1 HPV is a double-stranded DNA virus that infects cutaneous and mucosal epithelium through direct contact with micro-abrasions.1,2,3 HPV 16 has two oncoproteins, E6 and E7, that lead to cancer progression by degrading the p53 and pRb pathways.2,3 These pathways are responsible for preventing unchecked DNA replication, DNA damage, and cell proliferation.3 The diagnosis of HPV+ OPSCC is difficult as it can have a benign clinical presentation leading to a late-stage diagnosis.1 The current treatment for this cancer is surgical removal followed by radiation and chemotherapy. However, there is a great need for more targeted therapies as this treatment regimen and cancer can be quite disfiguring for the patient.1,2 Methods and Results. Whole-genome sequencing and RNA seq data of both HPV- and HPV+ OPSCC cell lines identified distinctly different secondary mutations between the HPV- and HPV+ samples.5 The HPV+ cancer cell lines had secondary somatic mutations in genes PIK3CA, TRAF, DDX3X, CYLD, and EP300, genes already targeted by E6 and E7.5 Additionally, using whole-genome sequencing and RNAseq data showed HPV viral genome integration into the host genome causing gene breakpoints.6 Viral genome integration leads to genomic instability by disrupting genes involved in innate immune response such as CD274, an immune checkpoint, and the gene coding the programmed cell death ligand.6 Viral integration promotes overexpression of surrounding genes, many of which are cancer-promoting.6 Mutant cell lines with early stop codons in oncoproteins E6 and E7, showed increased expression of cGAS-STING proteins and increased interferon production.7,8 HPV oncoproteins, E6 and E7, and secondary somatic mutations disrupt the cGAS-STING pathway which is responsible for detecting foreign viral DNA in the cell.5,8 Disruption of the cGAS-STING pathway leads to host immune evasion and downregulation of interferon production.8 Mice injected with HPV+ squamous cell carcinoma cell lines in the flank and the tongue were treated with anti-PD-1 and STING agonist therapy.9 The combination immunotherapy of anti-PD-1 and a STING agonist led to increased CD 8+ T-cells and tumor regression in both the flank and tongue.9 Conclusions. Secondary somatic mutations and viral genome integration contribute to genomic instability by disrupting genes functioning in innate immunity, interferon signaling, apoptosis, cGAS-STING pathway, and DNA damage repair.6,7 Additionally, HPV downregulates host immune response by targeting the cGAS-STING pathway and downregulating interferon production leading to immune evasion. The combination of genomic instability and immune evasion leads to carcinogenesis. Targeting these HPV mechanisms with an anti-PD-1 and STING agonist immunotherapy appears to be a promising therapy for HPV+ OPSCC cancer patients.
- Szymonowicz KA, Chen J. Biological and clinical aspects of HPV-related cancers. Cancer Biol Med. 2020;17(4):864-878. doi:10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0370
- Lechner M, Liu J, Masterson L, Fenton TR. HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer: epidemiology, molecular biology and clinical management [published online ahead of print, 2022 Feb 1]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022;1-22. doi:10.1038/s41571-022-00603-7
- Graham SV. The human papillomavirus replication cycle, and its links to cancer progression: a comprehensive review. Clin Sci (Lond). 2017;131(17):2201-2221. Published 2017 Aug 10. doi:10.1042/CS20160786
- Hoppe-Seyler K, Bossler F, Braun JA, Herrmann AL, Hoppe-Seyler F. The HPV E6/E7 Oncogenes: Key Factors for Viral Carcinogenesis and Therapeutic Targets. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26(2):158-168. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2017.07.007
- Gillison ML, Akagi K, Xiao W, et al. Human papillomavirus and the landscape of secondary genetic alterations in oral cancers. Genome Res. 2019;29(1):1-17. doi:10.1101/gr.241141.118
- Symer DE, Akagi K, Geiger HM, et al. Diverse tumorigenic consequences of human papillomavirus integration in primary oropharyngeal cancers. Genome Res. 2022;32(1):55-70. doi:10.1101/gr.275911.121
- James CD, Fontan CT, Otoa R, et al. Human Papillomavirus 16 E6 and E7 Synergistically Repress Innate Immune Gene Transcription. mSphere. 2020;5(1):e00828-19. Published 2020 Jan 8. doi:10.1128/mSphere.00828-19
- Shaikh MH, Bortnik V, McMillan NA, Idris A. cGAS-STING responses are dampened in high-risk HPV type 16 positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Microb Pathog. 2019;132:162-165. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2019.05.004
- Dorta-Estremera S, Hegde VL, Slay RB, et al. Targeting interferon signaling and CTLA-4 enhance the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in preclinical model of HPV+ oral cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7(1):252. Published 2019 Sep 18. doi:10.1186/s40425-019-0728-4