Proceedings of the Texas A&M Medical Student Grand Rounds

Mechanisms of DNA Damage in Breast Cancer and Inhibition of DNA Repair through PARP Inhibitors

July 16, 2019 Steven Le

Steven Le

Introduction. Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in women and evidence in research shows that breast cancer is becoming more prevalent in developed countries. Treatments depends on the cancer state, genomic markers, patient’s age, and known mutations such as BRCA 1/2 mutations. In types of breast cancer with BRCA mutations, PARP inhibition an effective method for treatment. The BRCA and PARP genes encode for DNA damage repair mechanisms, namely homologous recombination and base-excision repair. When cancer cells with BRCA mutation are treated with PARP inhibition, the cell will undergo apoptosis as a result of unrepaired DNA damage, as it lacks the necessary homologous recombination or base-excision repair mechanisms to fix the DNA damage. However, resistance to PARP inhibition can develop. Studies have found that the protein, RAD51, mediates resistance of cancer stem cells to PARP inhibition. Additional studies have found that PARP inhibitors can be combined with Myc blockage to improve efficacy. Methods. Cancer stem stems were screened for using ALDEFLUOR, which uses flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. An exploratory PCR array of 84 key DNA repair genes was completed and RAD51, which assists in DNA double-strand break repair, was identified as having higher expression in CSCs. siMYC were used to observe differences in gene expression of both MYC and RAD51. Dinaciclib was tested in combination with niraparib to observe its efficacy in improving sensitivity to PARP inhibition. Results. Lowest cell count was observed in BRCA mutant cells lines at high concentrations of PARP inhibition, as predicted. However, cancer stem cells show the opposite effect, as highest cell counts were observed in BRCA mutant cell lines with PARP inhibition. RAD51 KD in vitro and in vivo was used to determine the effect of the RAD51 protein in resistance to PARP inhibtion. MYC was found to specifically upregulate RAD 51 expression and activity, leading to increased recovery of homologous recombination repair (HR). Dinaciclib was proven as the best pharmacological treatment to improve the efficiacy of PARP inhibitors, because of Downregulation of MYC/RAD51 expression, synergistic effect with PARP inhibitor, and increase in apoptotic cells. Conclusions. PARP inhibition in cells with BRCA mutation prevent DNA damage repair and lead to death of cancer cells. Resistance of PARP inhibitors can develop through RAD51 in cancer stem cells of BRCA mutant cell lines. MYC inhibition, namely through Dinaciclib, can decrease RAD51 expression and improve efficacy of PARP inhibitors.

  1. Liu Y, Burness ML, Martin-Trevino R, Guy J, Bai S, Harouaka R, et al. RAD51 mediates resistance of cancer stem cells to PARP inhibition in triple-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(2):514–22.
  2. Carey JPW, Karakas C, Bui T, Chen X, Vijayaraghavan S, Zhao Y, et al. Synthetic lethality of PARP inhibitors in combination with MYC blockade is independent of BRCA status in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018;78(3):742–57
  3. Geenen, Jill J. J., et al. “PARP Inhibitors in the Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.” SpringerLink, Springer.
  4. Lord, Christopher J., and Alan Ashworth. “PARP Inhibitors: Synthetic Lethality in the Clinic.” Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science
  5. Ruoxi Hong, et al. “53BP1 Depletion Causes PARP Inhibitor Resistance in ATM-Deficient Breast Cancer Cells.” BMC Cancer, BioMed Central.
  6. Pilié, Patrick G., et al. “State-of-the-Art Strategies for Targeting the DNA Damage Response in Cancer.” Nature News, Nature Publishing Group.
  7. Robson, Mark.,et. al. “Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Patients with a Germline BRCA Mutation | NEJM.” New England Journal of Medicine, N Engl J.
Cancer Featured Abstracts
Previous Post

The Role of Inflammatory Response Element CTBP1 in Metabolic Syndrome and Prostate Cancer Metastasis

Next Post

The Implications of Differences in Spatial Distribution of LGR5 in Colorectal Cancer Adenomas as an Indication of Variations in Wnt Pathway Signaling Amount

Scientific Editors

Steve A. Maxwell

Executive Editor
Tel: 979-436-0804
smaxwell@medicine.tamhsc.edu

Robin Fuchs-Young

Deputy Editor
Tel: 979-845-5109
fuchs-young@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Administrative Editor

Janis Chmiel

Tel: 979-436-0856
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Editorial Office
Tel.: 979-845-2726
Fax: 979-847-9481
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Archives
  • July 2026
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • April 2021
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • February 2019
  • July 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Fmi by Forrss.