Proceedings of the Texas A&M Medical Student Grand Rounds

The role of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) in promoting M2 macrophage polarization following MSC treatment of severe cutaneous burn wounds

July 23, 2021 Ian T. Bui

Ian T. Bui

Introduction. Severe cutaneous burn wound is classified as a third- or higher-degree full thickness burn that involves destruction of epidermis and dermis1. Macrophages influence all steps in wound healing through their phenotypic polarization: pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype and anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype2,3. Traditional treatments such as Early Excision and Grafting (EE&G) have many limitations indicating a need for novel burn wound therapy1. Many studies indicated beneficial roles of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC), a multipotent stem cell, in treating full thickness wounds through secreting MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs). For example, Abo-Elkheir et al. demonstrated that injecting MSCs in burn wound lowered contracture and hypertrophic scars in patients compared to EE&G; Wang et al. showed TGF-β1, carried by MSC-EVs to macrophage, promoted M2 phenotype and suppressed M1 polarization via MiR-132/Mycbp2/TSC2 pathway4,5. Methods. He et al. utilized C57BL/6J mice to create full-thickness wounds. Human monocytes, exosomes Human jawbone marrow-derived MSC (JMMSCs), and human bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMMSCs) were injected in wound sites. Immunohistochemistry markers include CD68+ (macrophages), RELM-α (M2), and CD206 (M2). SiRab27a was used to inhibit exosomes release6. Gou et al. utilized BALB/c mice. Arginase-1, Fizz-1 and CD 206 were used as M2 markers. RT-PCR was used to analyzed expression of PBX/Knotted 1 Homeobox 1 (pknox1) protein6. Immunohistochemistry staining, western blot, and RNA extraction were utilized to analyze the samples in both experience6,7. Results. Macrophage-depletion BMMSCs and saline groups exhibited slower wound closure after 12-day assessment compared to macrophage presence MSCs groups (n=6). When injected systematically, MSCs homed to wound sites, and M2 polarization occurred at wound site, not at normal skin: RELM-α and CD68+ cells have higher percentage at wound sites treated with BMMSCs and JMMSCs than normal site and saline group (P<0.001). BMMSC and exosome treatments in mice had more cutaneous wound healing than BM/siRab27a infusion treatment after 12 days (P<0.05). Inhibiting miR-223 in exosomes reduces M2 macrophage polarization: CD206-positive macrophages in the miR-223 mimic group are higher than in the miR-223 inhibitor group (P<0.001)6. Gou et al. showed that Pknox1 mediated M2 macrophage polarization, and miR-223 bound and suppressed pknox1. Adding a mimic of miR-223 decreased concentration of pknox1 protein, and vice versa with inhibitor of miR-223. Pknox1 overexpression reduced M2 macrophage polarization compared to controlled miR-223+ group: amount of M2 macrophages markers such as Arginase-1, Fizz-1 are suppressed (P < 0.05) 7. Conclusions. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) found to promote wound healing via immunomodulating effects through secreting exosome: increasing anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype and suppressing pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype. One mechanism is MiR-223/pknox1 axis that involves MSC-EVs-derived MiR-2236,7. Thus, MSCs and MSC-EVs are potential novel therapeutic treatment in severe cutaneous burn wound.

  1. Jeschke MG, van Baar ME, Choudhry MA, Chung KK, Gibran NS, Logsetty S. Burn injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers. Feb 13 2020;6(1):11. doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0145-5.
  2. Magne B, Lataillade JJ, Trouillas M. Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Preconditioning: The Next Step Toward a Customized Treatment For Severe Burn. Stem Cells Dev. Oct 15 2018;27(20):1385-1405. doi:10.1089/scd.2018.0094
  3. Martin KE, García AJ. Macrophage phenotypes in tissue repair and the foreign body response: Implications for biomaterial-based regenerative medicine strategies. Acta Biomater. Mar 26 2021;doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.038
  4. Abo-Elkheir W, Hamza F, Elmofty AM, et al. Role of cord blood and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in recent deep burn: a case-control prospective study. Am J Stem Cells. 2017;6(3):23-35.
  5. Wang Y, Han B, Wang Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-secreted extracellular vesicles carrying TGF-β1 up-regulate miR-132 and promote mouse M2 macrophage polarization
  6. He X, Dong Z, Cao Y, et al. MSC-Derived Exosome Promotes M2 Polarization and Enhances Cutaneous Wound Healing. Stem Cells Int. 2019;2019:7132708. doi:10.1155/2019/7132708
  7. Gou W, Zhang Z, Yang C, Li Y. MiR-223/Pknox1 axis protects mice from CVB3-induced viral myocarditis by modulating macrophage polarization. Exp Cell Res. May 1 2018;366(1):41-48. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.03.004

 

Immunology Stem Cells
Previous Post

The Role of LCP Protein-Encoding Genes, Rv3267 and Rv3484, in Mycobacterium tuberculosis’ Evasion of the Innate Immune System and Consequent Development of Tuberculosis

Next Post

Micro RNA-Induced Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Osteoblasts in Osteoporosis

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Fmi by Forrss.