Proceedings of the Texas A&M Medical Student Grand Rounds

Sexual Dimorphisms in Pain Management: The Role of Estrogen Receptor Modulation after Spinal Cord Injury

July 17, 2025 Shehza Ghaffar

Shehza Ghaffar

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating neurological condition that leads to dysfunctions with widespread impacts on functioning.1 SCI is most commonly caused by trauma but can also result from various disease processes.1,2 An estimated 250,000–500,000 new SCI cases occur annually worldwide, yet treatment options remain limited.3 Furthermore, almost 2 of 3 people living with SCI will develop neuropathic pain within 6 months, a chronic noxious condition that can be debilitating, with females having higher pain morbidity.4,5 The aggregate of pain onset following SCI is influenced by various factors, including the extent of injury, inflammation, and acute treatment efforts.2 More recent studies also highlight a role for biological sex in the manifestation and progression of neuropathy.6 This sex-based disparity is driven by multifactorial biological mechanisms, including hormonal differences and the varying expression of pain-related receptors and inflammatory markers across the sexes.6

Objective: This narrative literature review explored the mechanisms by which estrogen contributes to sex differences in neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury, particularly through interactions with receptors.

Search Methods: An online search in the PubMed database was conducted from 2017 to 2025 using the following keywords: “estrogen”, “biological sex”, “spinal cord injury”, “neuropathic pain”.

Results: Estrogen has neuroprotective and analgesic effects after SCI.6 In animal models, E2 significantly reduced nociceptive symptoms, and was linked to lower inflammation and microglial activity.6 When estrogen-receptor antagonists were co-administered, the pain relief was reversed, confirming that the effect of E2 is receptor dependent.6 Additionally, the estrous cycle plays a role in this neuropathic sexual dimorphism.7 When sex hormones are rapidly changing or are low, the female model is more susceptible to symptoms of pain.7 Nociception can also disrupt the estrous cycle and impair recovery, showing a two-way relationship: hormonal fluctuations can manifest higher levels of pain, and this pain can reciprocally delay a normal estrous cycle that could benefit recovery.7 While the mechanism mediating the effect of estrogen on pain is still largely unknown, data suggests that sex differences are linked to estrogen modulation of GABA receptors and GPER signaling.8,9 There is evidence that activation of E2 modulated α6 subunit-containing GABAA receptors inhibits nociceptive transmission in models of neuropathic pain.8 However, the expression of these receptors varies in males and females after injury.8 Females showed a greater reduction in α6-GABAA expression—especially at the spinal dorsal horn—leading to heightened pain responses.8 In contrast, this reduction of antinociceptive receptors is less severe in males with no change in the spinal cord tissue.8 G protein-coupled estrogen receptor, alternatively, has been shown to interact with β-alanine to increase neuron excitability and drive neuroinflammation, both of which amplify pain responses.9 When GPER was blocked, pain-related neuron activity and inflammation markers were reduced, suggesting that GPER could be a valuable target for pain therapy.9

Conclusions: Ultimately, the studies confirm the ambivalent yet interrelated nature of  estrogens after SCI. In pathological states, sex-specific receptor changes affect pain, especially α6-GABAA or GPER. Further research into estrogen’s downstream mechanisms could be key to promising avenues for novel hormonal therapies and to help mitigate disparities female patients encounter.

Works Cited:

  1. Shoup JA, Welter J, Binswanger IA, et al. Spinal cord injury and prescribed opioids for pain: a scoping review. Pain Med. 2023;24(10):1138-1152. doi:10.1093/pm/pnad073
  2. Anjum A, Yazid MD, Fauzi Daud M, et al. Spinal Cord Injury: Pathophysiology, Multimolecular Interactions, and Underlying Recovery Mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(20):7533. Published 2020 Oct 13. doi:10.3390/ijms21207533
  3. Kim T, Chelluboina B, Chokkalla AK, Vemuganti R. Age and sex differences in the pathophysiology of acute CNS injury. Neurochem Int. 2019;127:22-28. doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2019.01.012
  4. Stewart AN, MacLean SM, Stromberg AJ, et al. Considerations for Studying Sex as a Biological Variable in Spinal Cord Injury. Front Neurol. 2020;11:802. Published 2020 Aug 5. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00802
  5. Stampacchia G, Gerini A, Morganti R, et al. Pain characteristics in Italian people with spinal cord injury: a multicentre study. Spinal Cord. 2022;60(7):604-611. doi:10.1038/s41393-021-00656-y
  6. Lee JY, Choi HY, Ju BG, Yune TY. Estrogen alleviates neuropathic pain induced after spinal cord injury by inhibiting microglia and astrocyte activation. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018;1864(7):2472-2480. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.04.006
  7. Baine RE, Johnston DT, Strain MM, et al. Noxious Stimulation Induces Acute Hemorrhage and Impairs Long-Term Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in Female Rats: Evidence Estrous Cycle May Have a Modulatory Effect. Neurotrauma Rep. 2022;3(1):70-86. Published 2022 Jan 31. doi:10.1089/neur.2021.0055
  8. Rodríguez-Palma EJ, Islas-Espinoza AM, Ramos-Rodríguez II, et al. Estradiol modulates the role of the spinal α6-subunit containing GABAA receptors in female rats with neuropathic pain. Eur J Pharmacol. 2024;974:176616. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176616
  9. Xu Z, Xie W, Feng Y, et al. Positive interaction between GPER and β-alanine in the dorsal root ganglion uncovers potential mechanisms: mediating continuous neuronal sensitization and neuroinflammation responses in neuropathic pain. J Neuroinflammation. 2022;19(1):164. Published 2022 Jun 21. doi:10.1186/s12974-022-02524-9
Neuroscience
Previous Post

Photodynamic Therapy for HPV- Induced Cervical Cancers

Next Post

NF-κB Dysregulation Contributes to Cardiac Dysfunction in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Through Disrupted Calcium Handling

Scientific Editors

Steve A. Maxwell

Executive Editor
Tel: 979-436-0804
smaxwell@medicine.tamhsc.edu

Robin Fuchs-Young

Deputy Editor
Tel: 979-845-5109
fuchs-young@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Administrative Editor

Janis Chmiel

Tel: 979-436-0856
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Editorial Office
Tel.: 979-845-2726
Fax: 979-847-9481
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Archives
  • July 2026
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • April 2021
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • February 2019
  • July 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Fmi by Forrss.