Proceedings of the Texas A&M Medical Student Grand Rounds

The Effects of Combined Drug Therapy in the Treatment of BRAF Mutated Melanoma

July 16, 2019 Mojahed Mohammad K Shalabi

Mojahed Mohammad K Shalabi

 Introduction: Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer in the world, with melanoma being the deadliest form of skin cancers contributing to approximately 75% of skin cancer deaths1. The prognosis of melanoma is determined by the stage of the disease, with a 5-year survival rate for Stage IV melanoma being around 25%. As a result, early detection of melanoma is key to drastically improving prognosis for melanoma patients. BRAFV600E mutation is the most common melanoma mutation1. BRAF is a proto-oncogene that promotes cell growth, proliferation, and survival1,2. BRAF is the main target for drug therapy in metastatic melanoma; however, cancerous cells quickly gain resistance to BRAF inhibitors by upregulating other intracellular growth pathways such as the Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/Protein Kinase B (PI3/AKT) pathway to maintain cell survival3,4. Combined drug therapy has shown promising results in the treatment of BRAFV600E mutated melanoma5. Methods: Splinkerette PCRs were performed to determine the BRAF inhibitor resistant cell lines with ERAS expression6. Western blot analysis was used to show that ERAS induces phosphorylation of AKT in the presence or absence of both a BRAF inhibitor, PLX4720, and an AKT inhibitor, MK2206. Western Blot analyses was also performed to determine the expression of Bcl-2 agonist of cell death (BAD), myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL1), and other apoptotic proteins in the cell lines in the presence or absence of PLX4720 and MK22066. Control and ERAS cells were stained with Annexin-V and analyzed by flow cytometry to record apoptotic responses of both cell lines in the presence of a PLX4720 alone, MK2206 alone, or PLX+MK6. Results: From the western blot analyses, ERAS expressed cell lines showed phosphorylation of AKT which in turns hyperphosphorylated BAD and decreased apoptosis in melanoma cells. This is resolved by a concomitant treatment with PLX4720 and MK2206, which blocks phosphorylation of BAD (p<0.05)6. From the flow cytometry, combinatorial BRAF and AKT inhibition showed enhanced apoptotic response in ERAS expressing cells and control cell lines (p<0.01)6. Conclusion: The BRAF gene plays an important role in the progression of melanoma by constitutively activating growth pathways and disrupting cellular mechanisms such as apoptosis. Resistance to treatment is very prevalent in melanoma treated with BRAF inhibitors alone7. Combined drug therapy that targets BRAF and a downstream target, or a protein in another growth signaling pathway such as AKT has shown to increase death of melanoma cells, increase delay of resistance, and significantly decrease disease progression7,8.

  1. Paolo A Ascierto, John M Kirkwood, Jean-Jacques Grob, et al. J Transl Med. 2012; 10: 85. Published online 2012 Jul 9. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-85. “The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma.”
  2. Hawryluk, E., Tsao H. “Melanoma: Clinical Features and Genomic Insights.” Cold Spring Harb Prospect Med. 2014 Sep; 4(9):a015388. Doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a015388.
  3. Griffin Merope, Scotto Daniele, Josephs Debra H., et al. “BRAF inhibitors: resisitance and the promise of combination treatments for melanoma.” Oncotarget.2017. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19836
  4. Niessner H, Schmitz J, Tabatabai G, Schmid AM, et al. “PI3K Pathway Inhibition Achieves Potent Antitumor Activity in Melanoma Brain Metastases In Vitro and In Vivo”. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 22:5818–28. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0064.
  5. Chante Karimkhani, Robert P. Dellavalle, Luc E. Coffeng, et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2017 May; 153(5): 406–412. Published online 2017 Mar 1. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.5538. “Global Skin Disease Morbidity and Mortality An Update From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.”
  6. Daniele Perna, Florian A. Karreth, Alistair G. Rust, et al. “BRAF inhibitor resistance mediated by the AKT pathway in an oncogenic BRAF mouse melanoma model.” January 26, 2015 https://doi-org.srv-proxy1.library.tamu.edu/10.1073/pnas.1418163112
  7. Xian Yang Chan, Alamdeep Singh, Narin Osman, Terrence J. Piva Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jul; 18(7): 1527. Published online 2017 Jul 14. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071527. “Role Played by Signalling Pathways in Overcoming BRAF Inhibitor Resistance in Melanoma.”
  8. Georgina V. Long, M.D., Ph.D., Daniil Stroyakovskiy, M.D., Helen Gogas, et al. “Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition versus BRAF Inhibition Alone in Melanoma.” N Engl J Med 2014. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406037

 

Cancer
Previous Post

The Role of PINK1/Parkin in Familial Parkinson’s Disease

Next Post

Genetic Variants of Complement Factor H and a High-Fat Diet are Associated with the Pathogenesis of Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Scientific Editors

Steve A. Maxwell

Executive Editor
Tel: 979-436-0804
smaxwell@medicine.tamhsc.edu

Robin Fuchs-Young

Deputy Editor
Tel: 979-845-5109
fuchs-young@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Administrative Editor

Janis Chmiel

Tel: 979-436-0856
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Editorial Office
Tel.: 979-845-2726
Fax: 979-847-9481
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Archives
  • July 2026
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • April 2021
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • February 2019
  • July 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Fmi by Forrss.