Proceedings of the Texas A&M Medical Student Grand Rounds

The Role of Notch Signaling in Osteogenic Differentiation of Dental-Derived Stem Cells

July 9, 2018 Jared A. Laney

Jared A. Laney

Introduction. Bone defects are commonly seen in medical practice; 5-10% of fractures do not heal properly and approximately 100,000 fractures annually are classified as non-union in the US.1-4 Complex bone defects/injuries, whether due to size, co-morbidities, or location can be difficult to heal.1-3,5 Treatment of these conditions requires advanced therapy fraught with risks that has no guarantee of success.2-3,6-7 Stem cells may provide a way to heal complex bone defects without these risks.3,7 Dental-derived stem cells (DDSCs) are particularly promising, being safer and easier to access compared to other harvesting methods and showing superb osteogenic ability.6,8-9 The complex signaling pathways required to promote osteogenic differentiation in DDSCs are incompletely understood, but it is known that the Notch pathway is involved.10 Experimental data to date has shown conflicting results regarding the role of Notch in DDSC differentiation; this may be due to methodology flaws that inaccurately represent the in vivo environment.10 Manokawinchoke et al. attempted to resolve some of these methodological difficulties with a novel experimental method.10 Methods. In order to mimic the tension found in the in vivo Notch receptor-ligand complex, Notch ligand Jagged1 was immobilized on tissue culture plates and subsequently exposed to human dental pulp cells (hDPs) and various experimental conditions.10 Results. Notch2 was the most common Notch receptor identified on hDPs.10 mRNA for Notch target genes HES1 and HEY1 was observed in greater amounts in the immobilized groups vs control.10  ALP was observed in higher amounts in the Jagged1 group vs control. 10 Mineral deposition was confirmed in the Jagged1 group.10 After incubating the plates in osteogenic medium, osteogenic marker genes were confirmed in greater numbers in the Jagged1 groups vs control.10  Experiments were run again with Notch2 knockout hDPs and the ALP/mineral deposition levels previously observed disappeared. A similar result occurred when the plates were exposed to DAPT.10 Conclusions. The Notch pathway seems to play an important role in stimulating osteogenesis in hDPs, with Notch2 being particularly important. Continued experimental use of immobilized Notch ligands may help to better elucidate the true in vivo impact of Notch signaling as it relates to osteogenic differentiation in hDPs. Similar methodology should be employed with other types of human dental stem cells to characterize the role of Notch signaling in those cell lines as well. Additional studies are needed to characterize the role of Notch receptors other than Notch2 in hDP osteogenesis.

 

  1. Ghiasi M, Chen J, Vaziri A, Rodriguez E, Nazarian A. Bone fracture healing in mechanobiological modeling: A review of principles and methods. Bone Rep. 2017;6:87-100. doi:10.1016/j.bonr.2017.03.002.
  2. Forrestal D, Klein T, Woodruff M. Challenges in engineering large customized bone constructs. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114(6):1129-1139. doi:10.1002/bit.26222.
  3. Wang C, Wang C, Chen H et al. Combination of resveratrol-containing collagen with adipose stem cells for craniofacial tissue-engineering applications. Int Wound J. 2018. doi:10.1111/iwj.12910.
  4. Hak DJ, Fitzpatrick D, Bishop JA, et al. Delayed union and nonunions: Epidemiology, clinical issues, and financial aspects. Injury. 2014;45. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.002.
  5. Kawecki F, Clafshenkel W, Fortin M, Auger F, Fradette J. Biomimetic Tissue-Engineered Bone Substitutes for Maxillofacial and Craniofacial Repair: The Potential of Cell Sheet Technologies. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017:1700919. doi:10.1002/adhm.201700919.
  6. Marta C, Rodolfo M, Laura T et al. Dental pulp stem cells for bone tissue engineering: a review of the current literature and a look to the future. Regen Med. 2018;13(2):207-218. doi:10.2217/rme-2017-0112.
  7. Mishra R, Bishop T, Valerio I, Fisher J, Dean D. The potential impact of bone tissue engineering in the clinic. Regen Med. 2016;11(6):571-587. doi:10.2217/rme-2016-0042.
  8. Leyendecker Junior A, Gomes Pinheiro C, Lazzaretti Fernandes T, Franco Bueno D. The use of human dental pulp stem cells for in vivo bone tissue engineering: A systematic review. J Tissue Eng. 2018;9:204173141775276. doi:10.1177/2041731417752766.
  9. Chalisserry E, Nam S, Park S, Anil S. Therapeutic potential of dental stem cells. J Tissue Eng. 2017;8:204173141770253. doi:10.1177/2041731417702531.
  10. Manokawinchoke J, Nattasit P, Thongngam T et al. Indirect immobilized Jagged1 suppresses cell cycle progression and induces odonto/osteogenic differentiation in human dental pulp cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10638-x.
Orthopedics Stem Cells
Previous Post

BDNF Action in the Mesolimbic Reward Pathway: An Additional Depression Paradigm

Next Post

BRCA1 signaling pathways in determining stem and progenitor cell fate

Scientific Editors

Steve A. Maxwell

Executive Editor
Tel: 979-436-0804
smaxwell@medicine.tamhsc.edu

Robin Fuchs-Young

Deputy Editor
Tel: 979-845-5109
fuchs-young@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Administrative Editor

Janis Chmiel

Tel: 979-436-0856
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Editorial Office
Tel.: 979-845-2726
Fax: 979-847-9481
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Archives
  • July 2026
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • April 2021
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • February 2019
  • July 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Fmi by Forrss.