Proceedings of the Texas A&M Medical Student Grand Rounds

Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells are best suited for cartilage and bone regeneration

September 21, 2017 Ikanke-abasi James

Ikanke-abasi James

 Introduction.  Sports injuries, accidental trauma, genetic defects, and aging are the most common causes of damage to articular cartilage and bony tissue. The incidence of hospitalized patient bone fractures is estimated to be 1 million in the United States. Surgery is the leading form of treatment. However, the risks associated with surgery include: include pain, swelling, nerve injury, rejection of bone graft, extended hospitalization, multiple donor sites leading to increased morbidity and significant graft resorption. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy is an alternative and has proven to be effective for osteochondral defects, osteogenesis imperfecta, and non-union bone fractures. Methods.  Studies have shown the beneficial use of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), however, emerging research shows that Wharton jelly derived MSCs (WJ-MSCs) are best suited for cartilage regeneration. Bone morphogenic protein (BMP), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and Transforming growth factor (TGF) are all important players in angiogenesis and cartilage regeneration. The role of bone morphogenic protein was evaluated using a rat model to determine how it impacts fracture healing. The immunogenicity of WJ-MSCs were compared with those from adult bone marrow in a rabbit’s knee to determine which has better immunosuppressive activity. Results.    BMPs are members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) protein superfamily and play a Crucial role in proliferation and differentiation of resident mesodermal progenitors. They upregulate growth factors such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), vascular endothelial growth factor and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1). As a result, they enhance chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage formation significantly. WJ-MSCs proved to be more hypoimmunogenic when compared to bone marrow MSCs and thus elicited a smaller immune response when engrafted into a rabbit’s knee. WJMSCs are non-invasive as they originate from an umbilical cord that loses purpose after birth. These MSCs displayed faster proliferation rates and lacked teratomas found with engrafting other mesenchymal stem cells. This is in large part due to the hypoimmunogenic ability of WJ-MSCs. MSCs isolated from Wharton jelly express significantly lower HLA-I, produce cytokines (TGFb and IL-10) that tolerate allogenic tissue. Conclusions.  Mesenchymal stem cells are a great alternative option for cartilage and bone repair. Wharton jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells are better suited because of their immunosuppressive activity. Lack of teratomas, painless collection procedure, faster proliferation rates and hypoimmunogenicity make WJ-MSCs safe & effective for cartilage regeneration.

  1.  Bayer Emily A., Fedorchak Morgan V., and Little Steven R.. Tissue Engineering Part A. November 2016, 22(21-22): 1296-1304
  2. C. Del Rosario, M. Rodríguez-Evora, R. Reyes, A. Delgado, C. Evora BMP-2, PDGF-BB, and bone marrow mesenchymal cells in a macroporous β-TCP scaffold for critical-size bone defect repair in rats. Biomedical Materials. 2015 (10-4)
  3. Goldberg A, Mitchell K, Soans J, Kim L, Zaidi R. The use of mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair and regeneration: a systematic review. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2017;12:39
  4. Liu S, Jia Y, Yuan M, et al. Repair of Osteochondral Defects Using Human Umbilical Cord Wharton’s Jelly-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rabbit Model. BioMed Research International. 2017;2017:8760383
  5. Liu et al., 2012, S. Liu, M. Yuan, K. Hou, L. Zhang, X. Zheng, B. Zhao, et al.Immune characterization of mesenchymal stem cells in human umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly and derived cartilage cells. Immune characterization of mesenchymal stem cells in human umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly and derived cartilage cells Cellular Immunology, 278 (July–August (1–2)) (2012), pp. 35–44
  6. Pot MW, Gonzales VK, Buma P, et al. Improved cartilage regeneration by implantation of acellular biomaterials after bone marrow stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies. Gentleman E, ed. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2243
  7. Zigdon-Giladi H, Rudich U, Michaeli Geller G, Evron A. Recent advances in bone regeneration using adult stem cells. World Journal of Stem Cells. 2015;7(3):630-640
Stem Cells
Previous Post

Exercise Induced Changes on miRNA Expression and Its Effect on Cardiovascular Disease

Next Post

microRNA-25 as a treatment in heart failure

Scientific Editors

Steve A. Maxwell

Executive Editor
Tel: 979-436-0804
smaxwell@medicine.tamhsc.edu

Robin Fuchs-Young

Deputy Editor
Tel: 979-845-5109
fuchs-young@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Administrative Editor

Janis Chmiel

Tel: 979-436-0856
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Editorial Office
Tel.: 979-845-2726
Fax: 979-847-9481
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Archives
  • July 2026
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • April 2021
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • February 2019
  • July 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Fmi by Forrss.