Proceedings of the Texas A&M Medical Student Grand Rounds

Therapeutic Targets and the Associated Difficulties in Treating Primary Raynaud’s Phenomenon

June 5, 2024 Brendan Olson

Brendan Olson

Background: Raynaud’s Phenomenon is a disease characterized by aberrant constriction of arterioles in response to various stimuli, typically cold exposure, that is commonly experienced in extremities and other more difficult-to-perfuse areas in the body. Primary Raynaud’s Phenomenon (PRP) has no underlying cause, contrasted with Secondary RP which has similar symptoms but is accompanied by another disease, typically scleroderma.1 PRP affects approximately 5% of the world’s population with high prevalence in females2,3 and a significant single nucleotide polymorphism found in the NOS1 gene.4 Additionally, the α2C-adrenoreceptor (α2C-AR) present in vascular smooth muscle (VSM) has been determined as the primary causative factor in this disease, leading to excessive vasoconstriction in response to cold environments.5 A better understanding of the α2C-AR, not only in VSM but elsewhere throughout the human body, may allow for novel therapeutic targets for PRP.

Objective: In this narrative review, potential therapeutic targets for PRP are discussed along with the associated difficulties in further pursuits to find effective treatments for patients who suffer from PRP.

Search Methods: A PubMed database search was conducted, selecting articles published from 2018-2024 using the “Raynaud Disease” MeSH term along with “Drug Therapy” and “Physiopathology” subheadings. Supplemental articles published before 2018 were selected for background information on PRP.

Results: α2C-AR gene transcription has been identified to use the cAMP/EPAC/JNK/AP1 pathway within VSM cells.6 Additionally, this pathway is associated with  G-Protein Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER) on the surface of VSM cells, which has long been hypothesized as one of the reasons for the increased female prevalence of PRP.7 Within the cell, trafficking of the α2C-AR from the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi compartment to the cell surface is dependent on the interactions of the actin protein Filamin-2 and the carboxyl terminus of the α2C-AR protein.8 Carboxyl terminal decoy peptides have been shown to decrease α2C-AR expression on the surface of VSM cells in vitro. Manipulating this pathway or the GPER/cAMP/EPAC/JNK/AP1 signaling pathway could be a novel therapeutic strategy for treating PRP. However, difficulties in developing these therapies arise due to the lack of proper animal models to mimic PRP symptoms and pathophysiology. Moreover, the α2C-AR is abundantly expressed throughout the body (e.g., neurons, fibroblasts, and endocrine cells) and commonly associated with the inhibition of pre-synaptic norepinephrine release.9 Administration of direct α2C-AR antagonists is expected to elicit widespread impacts throughout the body, particularly tachycardia and hypertension. Nevertheless, a recent safety and efficacy trial for a selective α2C-AR antagonist used for diabetic foot ulcer treatment was shown to be less prone to crossing the blood-brain barrier.10 It is possible that a similar or modified drug in manipulating α2C-AR signaling could be the key to prophylactic treatment or reduction of PRP severity.

Conclusions: With the α2C-AR signaling and trafficking pathways identified, therapeutics that selectively target these involved molecules may soon prove successful in the clinic. Though gaps in knowledge still exist, an animal model with selectively altered transcription of the α2C-AR gene in VSM may help further investigation and development of effective therapies for PRP.

Works Cited:

  1. Herrick AL, Wigley FM. Raynaud’s phenomenon. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2020;34(1):101474. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2019.101474
  2. Garner R, Kumari R, Lanyon P, Doherty M, Zhang W. Prevalence, risk factors and associations of primary Raynaud’s phenomenon: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ Open. 2015;5(3):e006389. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006389
  3. Belch J, Carlizza A, Carpentier PH, et al. ESVM guidelines – the diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon. VASA Z Gefasskrankheiten. 2017;46(6):413-423. doi:10.1024/0301-1526/a000661
  4. Munir S, Freidin MB, Brain S, Williams FMK. Association of Raynaud’s phenomenon with a polymorphism in the NOS1 gene. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(4):e0196279. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196279
  5. Fardoun MM, Nassif J, Issa K, Baydoun E, Eid AH. Raynaud’s Phenomenon: A Brief Review of the Underlying Mechanisms. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:438. doi:10.3389/fphar.2016.00438
  6. Fardoun MM, Issa K, Maaliki D, Nasser SA, Baydoun E, Eid AH. Estrogen increases expression of vascular alpha 2C adrenoceptor through the cAMP/Epac/JNK/AP-1 pathway and potentiates cold-induced vasoconstriction. Vascul Pharmacol. 2020;131:106690. doi:10.1016/j.vph.2020.106690
  7. Fardoun M, Nasser SA, El-Yazbi AF, Eid AH. GPER Acts Through the cAMP/Epac/JNK/AP-1 Pathway to Induce Transcription of Alpha 2C Adrenoceptor in Human Microvascular Smooth Muscle Cells. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2023;82(6):470-479. doi:10.1097/FJC.0000000000001489
  8. Raza A, Mohsin S, Saeed F, Ali SA, Chotani MA. Inhibiting Intracellular α2C-Adrenoceptor Surface Translocation Using Decoy Peptides: Identification of an Essential Role of the C-Terminus in Receptor Trafficking. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(24):17558. doi:10.3390/ijms242417558
  9. Gyires K, Zádori ZS, Török T, Mátyus P. alpha(2)-Adrenoceptor subtypes-mediated physiological, pharmacological actions. Neurochem Int. 2009;55(7):447-453. doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2009.05.014
  10. Kapsa S, Thuss U, Boxnick S, et al. Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of the α2C -Adrenoreceptor Antagonist BAY 1193397 in Healthy Male Subjects. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2022;11(3):296-308. doi:10.1002/cpdd.1018

 

Cardiology Featured Abstracts
Previous Post

Melanoma-Derived Cytokine Impairment of Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Through Toll-like Receptor 7/9 and STING Pathway

Next Post

Bicarbonate Transporter slc4a4: a Potential Therapeutic Target for Pancreatic Cancer

Scientific Editors

Steve A. Maxwell

Executive Editor
Tel: 979-436-0804
smaxwell@medicine.tamhsc.edu

Robin Fuchs-Young

Deputy Editor
Tel: 979-845-5109
fuchs-young@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Administrative Editor

Janis Chmiel

Tel: 979-436-0856
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Editorial Office
Tel.: 979-845-2726
Fax: 979-847-9481
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Archives
  • July 2026
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • April 2021
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • February 2019
  • July 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Fmi by Forrss.