Proceedings of the Texas A&M Medical Student Grand Rounds

Tracheal Reconstruction: State of the Art

July 30, 2025 Cameron Keehn

Cameron Keehn

Background:  Tracheal reconstruction restores normal airway function in patients with a variety of structural and pathological airway conditions1. Indications for reconstruction are diverse2,3. Examples include various stenotic conditions4, structural weakness, or tissue resections. Given the complex anatomy and critical function of the trachea, reconstruction plays a key role in airway function restoration when conventional therapies are insufficient. While surgical reconstruction has been a standard option for many indications, limitations due to vasculature, tracheal mobilization, and tissue healing have been identified in literature for current surgical techniques. As new findings for regenerative techniques and technologies surface, potential applications have been identified to further the cutting edge of tracheal reconstruction.

Methods: A literature review was conducted via PubMed with search terms such as “tracheal reconstruction,” “tracheoplasty,” and similar terminology. Historical and developmental insights were drawn from the work of Dr. Hermes Grillo, a pioneer in the field of tracheal surgery. Dr. Grillo’s contributions remain central to current reconstructive approaches1.

Results: Tracheal reconstruction was consistently identified as the standard of care for cases involving severe or recurrent stenosis, tracheomalacia, or extensive airway involvement from tumors or trauma5-8. Surgical intervention in these cases was associated with superior restoration of airway function and improved patient outcomes when compared to medical treatment. Techniques such as slide tracheoplasty and segmental resection with primary anastomosis have developed to their present standard of care to offer reliable outcomes with acceptable patient outcomes. The standard of care is limited now by physiological constraints. Further development will require the use of novel techniques and tools such as bioreactors, scaffolds, and engineered tissue constructs3,9.

Conclusions: When indicated, tracheal reconstruction offers a proven restorative approach to complex airway pathology. Ongoing advances in surgical technique, peri-operative care, and interdisciplinary collaboration continue to enhance outcomes in this challenging yet critical area of thoracic surgery. A significant opportunity currently exists to expand the capabilities within tracheal reconstruction through advancements in tissue engineering and regenerative surgical techniques.

Works Cited:

  1. Grillo HC, Mathisen DJ. Tracheal resection and reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73(6):199-206. https://www.annalsthoracicsurgery.org/article/S0003-4975(02)04108-5/fulltext. Accessed April 22, 2025.
  2. Grillo HC, Donahue DM. Postintubation tracheal stenosis. Ann Surg. 2002;236(4):517-523. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003497502035646. Accessed April 22, 2025.
  3. Scagnolari C, De Angelis M, Gianchecchi E, et al. Advances in tracheal reconstruction: a review. Front Med (Lausanne).2021;8:726497. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8306535/. Accessed April 22, 2025.
  4. Hofferberth S, Watters K, Rahbar R, Fynn-Thompson F. Evolution of surgical approaches in the management of congenital tracheal stenosis: single-center experience. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2016;7(1):16–24. doi:10.1177/2150135115606627
  5. Manning PB. Slide tracheoplasty for congenital tracheal stenosis. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;12(3):184–193. doi:10.1053/j.optechstcvs.2007.06.006
  6. Dronkers EAC, Yaghchi CA, So RJ, et al. Open laryngotracheal reconstruction for iatrogenic posterior glottic stenosis in adults: international multicenter experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025;282(1):303–315. doi:10.1007/s00405-024-09004-1. Epub 2024 Oct 5. PMID: 39369096.
  7. Albrecht NM, Ostrower S. Case report of a laryngotracheal reconstruction with anterior and posterior costal cartilage graft and stent placement – surgical technique. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024;85:104993. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2024.104993
  8. Lazzaro RS, Patton JH, Inra ML, Gaissert HA. Robotic tracheobronchoplasty: technique. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;27(2):218–226. doi:10.1053/j.optechstcvs.2021.09.010
  9. Bordbar S, Li Z, Lotfibakhshaiesh N, et al. Cartilage tissue engineering using decellularized biomatrix hydrogel containing TGF-β-loaded alginate microspheres in mechanically loaded bioreactor. Sci Rep. 2024;14:11991. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-62474-5
Engineering Medicine Featured Abstracts
Previous Post

Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome Management in Resource-Limited Settings

Next Post

Assessing the Effects of Space Travel on the Gut Microbiome and the Potential Impacts on Future Mission Planning

Scientific Editors

Steve A. Maxwell

Executive Editor
Tel: 979-436-0804
smaxwell@medicine.tamhsc.edu

Robin Fuchs-Young

Deputy Editor
Tel: 979-845-5109
fuchs-young@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Administrative Editor

Janis Chmiel

Tel: 979-436-0856
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Editorial Office
Tel.: 979-845-2726
Fax: 979-847-9481
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Archives
  • July 2026
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • April 2021
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • February 2019
  • July 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Fmi by Forrss.