Proceedings of the Texas A&M Medical Student Grand Rounds

DC3 Cells Infiltration in the Tumor Microenvironment is Associated with Immune Response of Leptomeningeal and Brain Metastatic Melanoma

June 12, 2024 William Wakeland

William Wakeland

Background: Metastatic melanoma presents a formidable challenge due to its aggressive nature and dissemination. 325,000 new melanoma cases were diagnosed in 2020. An estimation of 510,000 new cases per year is predicted by 20401. Despite advancements in treatment modalities and the  high incidence of the disease, metastatic melanoma remains associated with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. 40.5% of patients with a metastatic melanoma were fatal, with the most common metastasis site being the central nervous system (CNS)2. The unique tissue microenvironment of the CNS is a significant factor homing the metastatic melanoma cells to the CNS and suppressing immune response. Within the CNS metastasis, patients with metastatic brain melanoma (MBM) patients have a better prognosis and slower disease progression than those with leptomeningeal metastatic melanoma (LMM). Understanding the intricate landscape of metastasis in melanoma holds paramount importance in tailoring effective therapeutic strategies and improving patient outcomes. This review discusses the mechanism by which metastatic melanoma exhibits metastatic site-specific immune responses, and significant difference in outcomes between MBM and LMM.

Objective: To investigate whether the unique pressures of the brain and leptomeninges contributes to the activity of immune cells to identify and eliminate cancer cells.

Search Methods: An online search in the PubMed and the Frontiers in Oncology &Microbiology databases using the keywords: “metastatic melanoma, leptomeningeal metastasis, brain metastasis, ”

Results. Metastatic melanoma, and many other cancers, exhibit metastatic site-specific pathological features. The amplification of MYC, YAP1, and MMP13 genes with downregulation of CDKN2A/B are the most significant changes associating with the CNS metastasis3, which differed from the primary tumor and other organ metastasis. Brain and leptomeningeal metastasis exhibit different responses to immunotherapies. Leptomeningeal metastasis derived from lung cancer demonstrated enhanced immune evasion from Gefitinib than the primary tumor. Increased MET gene copy numbers were associated with this increased immune suppressive ability4. One theory is that this different immune response may be due to a unique immune response of the leptomeninges compared to the brain. Recently, it was found that LMM recruited a higher proportion of CD4+ cells compared to brain and surrounding lymph node metastases. It is hypothesized that the MBM specific presence of DC3 dendritic cells affects CD4+ cell recruitment.  Tumors with DC3 presence had more CD8+ cell recruitment, and high expression of specific cytokines and chemokines that serves as chemoattractant for CD8+ cells5,6. Since the immune response in MBM is stronger than in LMM and the MBM patients have a better prognosis than MBM patients, it is important to understand why DC3 cells only present in MBM. It is likely that cancer cells in the leptomeninges uniquely suppress DC3 proliferation, and therefore, poor immune responses, which lead to poor prognosis outcomes. More research is needed to understand how the LMM microenvironment suppresses DC3 proliferation, and thus, immune response.

Work Cited:

  1. Arnold M, Singh D, Laversanne M, et al. Global Burden of Cutaneous Melanoma in 2020 and Projections to 2040. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(5):495-503. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0160
  2. Sandru A, Voinea S, Panaitescu E, Blidaru A. Survival rates of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. J Med Life. 2014;7(4):572-576.
  3. Shih DJH, Nayyar N, Bihun I, et al. Genomic characterization of human brain metastases identifies drivers of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Nat Genet. 2020;52(4):371-377. doi:10.1038/s41588-020-0592-7
  4. Nanjo S, Arai S, Wang W, et al. MET Copy Number Gain Is Associated with Gefitinib Resistance in Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis of EGFR-mutant Lung Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16(3):506-515. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0522
  5. Mabrouk N, Tran T, Sam I, et al. CXCR6 expressing T cells: Functions and role in the control of tumors. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1022136. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1022136
  6. Smalley I, Chen Z, Phadke M, et al. Single cell characterization of the immune microenvironment of melanoma brain and leptomeningeal metastases. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2021;27(14):4109-4125. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1694

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancer Featured Abstracts Immunology
Previous Post

Role of Rac1 in Mitochondrial Damage Exacerbating Diabetic Retinopathy

Next Post

Genetic Mechanisms of Colorectal Cancer and Metastasis, Characterization of SMOC gene and Implications of its Role in BMP Signaling and the Progression of Colorectal Traditional Serrated Adenomas

Scientific Editors

Steve A. Maxwell

Executive Editor
Tel: 979-436-0804
smaxwell@medicine.tamhsc.edu

Robin Fuchs-Young

Deputy Editor
Tel: 979-845-5109
fuchs-young@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Administrative Editor

Janis Chmiel

Tel: 979-436-0856
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Editorial Office
Tel.: 979-845-2726
Fax: 979-847-9481
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Archives
  • July 2026
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • April 2021
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • February 2019
  • July 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Fmi by Forrss.