Proceedings of the Texas A&M Medical Student Grand Rounds

Addressing the Rotator Cuff Problem: Lessons from the Hamstring

June 24, 2024 Andrei Demkov

Andrei Demkov

Background: Rotator cuff (RC) injuries are prevalent among orthopedic pathologies, significantly contributing to the surgical burden each year.1 These injuries exhibit a spectrum of severity from minor partial-thickness tears to extensive, retracted disruptions. Typically addressed through arthroscopic techniques, the recurrence of tears post-repair varies widely; smaller tears exhibit approximately a 20% re-rupture rate, while massive tears can experience re-rupture rates as high as 94%, according to some studies.2 In contrast, proximal hamstring tears, more common in young, athletic individuals, show markedly better prognosis, with a re-rupture rate below 3%.3,4 This divergence largely stems from the differential in preoperative musculotendinous conditions—hamstring injuries occur in patients with generally healthier tissue quality, whereas RC tears are increasingly frequent in aging individuals, particularly over 70 years, who often present significant muscular atrophy, a condition potentiated by cellular aging.5–7 This stark contrast in clinical outcomes has spurred a diverse array of therapeutic approaches, which will be critically evaluated here.

Search Methods: PubMed searches including, but not limited to the terms: “rotator cuff atrophy,” “rotator cuff re-rupture,” and “tendon atrophy.”

Results: Current interventions targeting musculotendinous atrophy and senescence fall into three primary categories: pharmacological, biological, and cellular therapies. Pharmacological strategies have included the use of a metformin and leucine cocktail, which has shown efficacy in mitigating atrophy in cultured cells.8 However, while other pharmacological agents, both anabolic and anti-catabolic, have been explored, the former often introduces systemic side effects, and the latter does not rectify pre-existing atrophy. Biological treatments, particularly platelet-rich plasma injections, mirror the limitations of anti-catabolics, offering insufficient benefits for perioperative care.9 Conversely, cellular therapies emerge as the most promising, with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) frequently employed in regenerative protocols. In their undifferentiated state, MSCs primarily act by secreting growth factors, similarly to PRP.9 They do, however, hold potential for tenogenic differentiation through mechanotransduction.10 Certain studies have shown promising results in tenogenic differentiation that would be necessary to rejuvenate senescent patient tissues.11,12

Conclusions: Despite advances in pharmacological and biological therapies, the prevailing medical protocols inadequately address tissue atrophy and senescence associated with rotator cuff injuries. The rejuvenation of RC tissues through tenogenic differentiation of MSCs presents a viable strategy to diminish re-rupture rates in older adults with significant tears. Further research is imperative to refine MSC differentiation protocols and to investigate combined treatments that integrate cellular and biological therapies to enhance clinical outcomes.

Works Cited:

  1. May T, Garmel GM. Rotator Cuff Injury. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547664/
  2. Zhao J, Luo M, Pan J, et al. Risk factors affecting rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic repair: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2021;30(11):2660-2670. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2021.05.010
  3. Harris JD, Griesser MJ, Best TM, Ellis TJ. Treatment of Proximal Hamstring Ruptures – A Systematic Review. Int J Sports Med. 2011;32(07):490-495. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1273753
  4. Fletcher AN, Cheah JW, Nho SJ, Mather RC. Proximal Hamstring Injuries. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2021;40(2):339-361. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2021.01.003
  5. Minagawa H, Yamamoto N, Abe H, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population: From mass-screening in one village. J Orthop. 2013;10(1):8-12. doi:10.1016/j.jor.2013.01.008
  6. Parker E, Khayrullin A, Kent A, et al. Hindlimb Immobilization Increases IL-1β and Cdkn2a Expression in Skeletal Muscle Fibro-Adipogenic Progenitor Cells: A Link Between Senescence and Muscle Disuse Atrophy. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;9:790437. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.790437
  7. DE GIORGI S, SARACINO M, CASTAGNA A. Degenerative disease in rotator cuff tears: what are the biochemical and histological changes? Joints. 2014;2(1):26-28.
  8. Petrocelli JJ, de Hart NMMP, Lang MJ, et al. Cellular senescence and disrupted proteostasis induced by myotube atrophy are prevented with low-dose metformin and leucine cocktail. Aging (Albany NY). 2023;15(6):1808-1832. doi:10.18632/aging.204600
  9. Leong NL, Kator JL, Clemens TL, James A, Enamoto-Iwamoto M, Jiang J. Tendon and Ligament Healing and Current Approaches to Tendon and Ligament Regeneration. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2020;38(1):7-12. doi:10.1002/jor.24475
  10. 10.Chen X, Yan J, He F, et al. Mechanical stretch induces antioxidant responses and osteogenic differentiation in human mesenchymal stem cells through activation of the AMPK-SIRT1 signaling pathway. Free Radic Biol Med. 2018;126:187-201. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.08.001
  11. 11.Kishore V, Bullock W, Sun X, Van Dyke WS, Akkus O. Tenogenic differentiation of human MSCs induced by the topography of electrochemically aligned collagen threads. Biomaterials. 2012;33(7):2137-2144. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.066
  12. 12.Maharam E, Yaport M, Villanueva NL, et al. Rho/Rock signal transduction pathway is required for MSC tenogenic differentiation. Bone Res. 2015;3(1):1-9. doi:10.1038/boneres.2015.15
Engineering Medicine Featured Abstracts Orthopedics
Previous Post

The Future of Spatial Multi-omics: Newly Developed Approaches to Assess Prognosis and Predict Treatment Outcomes in HER2+ Breast Cancer

Next Post

Exploring Molecular Targets for Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy

Scientific Editors

Steve A. Maxwell

Executive Editor
Tel: 979-436-0804
smaxwell@medicine.tamhsc.edu

Robin Fuchs-Young

Deputy Editor
Tel: 979-845-5109
fuchs-young@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Administrative Editor

Janis Chmiel

Tel: 979-436-0856
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Editorial Office
Tel.: 979-845-2726
Fax: 979-847-9481
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Archives
  • July 2026
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • April 2021
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • February 2019
  • July 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Fmi by Forrss.