Proceedings of the Texas A&M Medical Student Grand Rounds

Breaking the Bacterial Biofilm to Enhance Wound Healing in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers

June 25, 2024 Rebecca Franklin

Rebecca Franklin

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most prevalent endocrine diseases worldwide.1 It is estimated that 25% of patients will develop a non-healing wound with a recurrence rate of 40% (<1 year) and 65% (<5 years).2 The most common non-healing wound is a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) which can lead to infection, amputation, and potentially even death.1 DFUs can be colonized by bacteria that produce biofilms, conferring simultaneous protection from the host immune system and antibiotics.1 While 70% of all lower limb amputations are due to DFUs, this has a greater negative impact on quality of life than any other complication of diabetes.1  Traditional antibiotic therapies are not effective against biofilm-associated infections, necessitating the development of innovative non-antibiotic solutions that can break biofilm and enhance wound healing. While electrical stimulation, bacteriophage therapy, and the utilization of scavenging nanoparticles have each demonstrated efficacy independently in targeting and treating DFUs— they collectively offer a complementary approach that can address intrinsic shortcomings of individual treatments, enhancing overall therapeutic outcomes.3–5

Methods: The literature review synthesized information from scholarly databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Nature, and Front Med. A systematic search strategy was employed to identify literature published within the last 5 years (2019-2024) utilizing the following search terms, in various combinations:

  • “diabetic foot ulcers”
  • “diabetes foot complications”
  • “diabetic foot management”
  • “wound healing in diabetes”
  • “biofilm for diabetic foot ulcers”

Results: The proposed solution involves a multifaceted approach: firstly, employing low-voltage, pulsed, electrical stimulation to disrupt the biofilm structure, followed by the application of SeC@PA nanoparticles that will scavenge glutathione peroxidase, thereby inhibiting the biofilm’s ability to protect itself from damage.3,4 Lastly, bacteriophages would be utilized to specifically target and eliminate pathogenic bacteria and those possessing the highest number of biofilm-producing genes, facilitating the restoration of bacterial populations to their normal levels.5 Mice studies have demonstrated the independent efficacy of each component highlighting the potential of this synergistic approach for personalized therapy.3–5

Conclusions: DFU research emphasizes the need for novel therapeutics to combat biofilm infections in DFUs. The findings suggest that a multifaceted strategy integrating electrical stimulation, scavenging nanoparticles, and bacteriophage therapy holds promise in disrupting biofilms and promoting wound healing. Implementation of this approach in clinical practice could lead to faster healing times and reduced complications for patients. Further research is essential to optimize parameters, refine interventions, and assess long-term efficacy.

Works Cited:

  1. Afonso AC, Oliveira D, Saavedra MJ, Borges A, Simões M. Biofilms in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Impact, Risk Factors and Control Strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(15):8278. doi:10.3390/ijms22158278
  2. Burgess JL, Wyant WA, Abdo Abujamra B, Kirsner RS, Jozic I. Diabetic Wound-Healing Science. Medicina (Mex). 2021;57(10):1072. doi:10.3390/medicina57101072
  3. Ashrafi M, Novak‐Frazer L, Morris J, Baguneid M, Rautemaa‐Richardson R, Bayat A. Electrical stimulation disrupts biofilms in a human wound model and reveals the potential for monitoring treatment response with volatile biomarkers: Wound Repair & Regeneration. Wound Repair Regen. 2019;27(1):5-18. doi:10.1111/wrr.12679
  4. Yang L, Zhang D, Li W, et al. Biofilm microenvironment triggered self-enhancing photodynamic immunomodulatory microneedle for diabetic wound therapy. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):7658. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43067-8
  5. Albac S, Medina M, Labrousse D, et al. Efficacy of Bacteriophages in a Staphylococcus aureus Nondiabetic or Diabetic Foot Infection Murine Model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(2):10.1128/aac.01870-19. doi:10.1128/aac.01870-19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diabetes Engineering Medicine Featured Abstracts Microbiology
Previous Post

Risk Factors for Postoperative Delirium: An Analysis

Next Post

Retinal Biomarkers for the Early Screening of Alzheimer’s Disease

Scientific Editors

Steve A. Maxwell

Executive Editor
Tel: 979-436-0804
smaxwell@medicine.tamhsc.edu

Robin Fuchs-Young

Deputy Editor
Tel: 979-845-5109
fuchs-young@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Administrative Editor

Janis Chmiel

Tel: 979-436-0856
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Editorial Office
Tel.: 979-845-2726
Fax: 979-847-9481
chmiel@medicine.tamhsc.edu
Archives
  • July 2026
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • April 2021
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • February 2019
  • July 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Fmi by Forrss.